StopUMTS Logo
how to get rid of moles 
Zoeken
   
Voorlichting
02/07/18Informatie en tips m.b.t.
28/06/18Frequenties gebruikt bij
Artikelen
16/07/18Firefighters Suffer Neuro
16/07/18With teen mental health d
16/07/18The inconvenient truth ab
07/07/18'Wifi op speelplaatsen on
30/06/18Countries ban iPads and m
22/06/18SAR waarden, Phones emitt
Berichten Nederland
13/07/18Zelfs VodafoneZiggo-ceo m
10/07/18Update Gemeente Heusden -
09/07/18Ziek door straling: slach
06/07/18Nederlandse providers moe
05/07/18De Omgevingswet en elektr
Berichten België
16/06/18Scherpenheuvel-Zichem: Be
14/06/18Tommelein laat straling d
Berichten Internationaal
11/07/18USA: Berkeley Cell Phone
29/06/18Frankrijk: Appeal for the
28/06/18Ierland: Proposed legisla
27/06/18Frankrijk: Hypersensitivi
Ervaringen | Appellen/oproepen
03/07/18Slimme meter ervaring
28/05/18Stralingsarme werkplek
28/05/18Ervaring in Denemarken
Onderzoeken
12/07/185 G wireless telecommunic
30/06/18Nervous system manipulati
21/06/18Absorption of wireless ra
Veel gestelde vragen
13/05/17Vakantie? Witte zo
10/07/16Zeven veel gestelde vrage
Juridische informatie
01/06/18Wetgeving hoogspanningsli
15/05/18Brit dad sues Nokia for u
02/03/18Formal Complaint to the E
Oproepen
29/06/18Tegenlicht wordt 30% geko
15/06/18Stem voor plan voor een w
24/05/18Lezing in Westerhoven: Sm
Folders
10/09/17Brochures, folders, websi
29/04/16USA: Meer dan 50 tips voo
Briefwisselingen | Archief: 2008, 2005
07/07/18E/mail naar alle raadsled
07/07/18E-mail naar de TV redacti
Illustraties
 Algemeen
 Fotoalbum zendmasten
 Wetenschappelijke illustraties
Effects of cell phone use on semen parameters: Results from the MARHCS cohort study    
Ga naar overzicht berichten in: Onderzoeken

Effects of cell phone use on semen parameters: Results from the MARHCS cohort study
woensdag, 09 maart 2016 - Dossier: Algemeen


Bron: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949865?dopt=Abstract

Environ Int. 2016 Mar 4;91:116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.028. (Epub ahead of print)

Effects of cell phone use on semen parameters: Results from the MARHCS cohort study in Chongqing, China.

Zhang G 1, Yan H 1, Chen Q 1, Liu K 1, Ling X 1, Sun L 1, Zhou N 1, Wang Z 1, Zou P 1, Wang X 1, Tan L 1, Cui Z 1, Zhou Z 2, Liu J 1, Ao L3, Cao J 4.

1 Institute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
2 Department of Environmental Health, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
3 Institute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: aolin117@163.com.
4 Institute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: caojia1962@126.com.

Abstract
Epidemiological and experimental evidence for detrimental effects of cell phone use on semen quality is still equivocal. And that recruiting participants from infertility clinic not from general population may raise the possibility of a selection bias. To investigate effects of cell phone use on semen parameters in a general population,We screened and documented the cell phone use information of 794 young men from the Male Reproductive Health in Chongqing College students (MARHCS) cohort study in 2013, followed by 666 and 568 in 2014 and 2015, respectively. In the univariate regression analyses, we found that the daily duration of talking on the cell phone was significantly associated with decreased semen parameters, including sperm concentration β coefficient=-6.32% per unit daily duration of talking on the cell phone (h); 95% confidence interval (CI), -11.94, -0.34 and total sperm count (-8.23; 95% CI, -14.38, -1.63) in 2013; semen volume (-8.37; 95% CI, -15.93, -0.13) and total sperm count (-16.59; 95% CI, -29.91, -0.73) in 2015. Internet use via cellular networks was also associated with decreased sperm concentration and total sperm counts in 2013 and decreased semen volume in 2015. Multivariate analyses were used to adjust for the effects of potential confounders, and significant negative associations between internet use and semen parameters remained. Consistent but nonsignificant negative associations between talking on the cell phone and semen parameters persisted throughout the three study years, and the negative association was statistically significant in a mixed model that considered all three years of data on talking on the cell phone and semen quality. Our results showed that certain aspects of cell phone use may negatively affect sperm quality in men by decreasing the semen volume, sperm concentration, or sperm count, thus impairing male fertility.

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:
Cell phone; Internet use; Sperm parameters; Talking


Ga terug naar het hoofdmenu
Afdrukken | Vragen | RSS | Disclaimer