Pall: Safety Guidelines for RF radiation, a critical review

donderdag, 04 juli 2019 - Categorie: Artikelen

mei 2019

Eight Repeatedly Documented Findings Each Show that EMF Safety Guidelines Do Not
Predict Biological Effects and Are, Therefore Fraudulent:
The Consequences for Both Microwave Frequency Exposures and Also 5G

Martin L. Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences,
Washington State University,


ICNIRP, US FCC, EU and other EMF safety guidelines are all based on the assumption that
average EMF intensities and average SAR can be used to predict biological effects and therefore
safety. Eight different types of quantitative or qualitative data are analyzed here to determine
whether these safety guidelines predict biological effects. In each case the safety guidelines fail
and in most of these, fail massively. Effects occur at approximately 100,000 times below
allowable levels and the basic structure of the safety guidelines is shown to be deeply flawed.
The safety guidelines ignore demonstrated biological heterogeneity and established biological
mechanisms. Even the physics underlying the safety guidelines is shown to be flawed. Pulsed
EMFs are in most cases much more biologically active than are non-pulsed EMFs of the same
average intensity, but pulsations are ignored in the safety guidelines despite the fact that almost
all of our current exposures are highly pulsed. There are exposure windows such that maximum
effects are produced in certain intensity windows and also in certain frequency windows but the
consequent very complex dose-response curves are ignored by the safety guidelines. Several
additional flaws in the safety guidelines are shown through studies of both individual and paired
nanosecond pulses. The properties of 5G predict that guidelines will be even more flawed in
predicting 5G effects than the already stunning flaws that the safety guidelines have in predicting
our other EMF exposures. The consequences of these findings is that “safety guidelines” should
always be expressed in quotation marks; they do not predict biological effects and therefore do
not predict safety. Because of that we have a multi-trillion dollar set of companies, the
telecommunication industry, where all assurances of safety are fraudulent because they are based
on these “safety guidelines.”

For the complete paper see the link on top

Lees verder in de categorie Artikelen | Terug naar homepage | Lees de introductie