StopUMTS Logo
how to get rid of moles 
Zoeken
   
Voorlichting
16/01/18Toon : de 'slimme' thermo
14/01/18Medical Dictionary; micro
Artikelen
19/01/18Home networking explained
14/01/18Can Cell Phones Cause Fem
14/01/18Wetenschappers binden str
12/01/18Apple: Open letter from J
12/01/18Studenten die vaker met s
08/01/18Zonnepanelen; Solar Panel
Berichten Nederland
20/01/18Mobiel internetten explod
20/01/18Voorschoten: D66: bescher
18/01/18Unlimited 4G voor thuis g
17/01/18Vergaderlocatie / cursusr
14/01/18Ziek van Straling; Fotose
Berichten België
18/01/18Aartselaar / Reet: Buren
10/01/18Vereniging ElektroHyperSe
Berichten Internationaal
15/01/18Frankrijk pakt belabberde
12/01/18Oostenrijk: Richtlijnen v
12/01/18Frankreich verordnet Stra
09/01/18USA: CDPH Cell Phone Safe
Ervaringen | Appellen/oproepen
15/01/18Ziekmakende ervaringen me
12/01/18Soms is tinnitus geen tin
12/01/18Bijnier probleem met smar
Onderzoeken
20/01/18Iron deposition in rabbit
03/01/18EMFs + Wildlife
29/12/17Radiofrequency EMFs and H
Veel gestelde vragen
13/05/17Vakantie? Witte zo
10/07/16Zeven veel gestelde vrage
Juridische informatie
19/01/18Afspraken voor beterere t
01/01/18Antennebeleid op basis va
15/12/17(Persbericht) Phonegate:
Oproepen
10/12/17Haarlem: Raadsmarkt ZENDM
11/11/17Cursus ‘Straling meten
29/10/17Petitie: Geen uitbreiding
Folders
10/09/17Brochures, folders, websi
29/04/16USA: Meer dan 50 tips voo
Briefwisselingen | Archief: 2008, 2005
19/01/18Brief aan Agentschap Tele
18/01/18Brief naar de gemeente Ut
Illustraties
 Algemeen
 Fotoalbum zendmasten
 Wetenschappelijke illustraties
Effects of cell phone use on semen parameters: Results from the MARHCS cohort study    
Ga naar overzicht berichten in: Onderzoeken

Effects of cell phone use on semen parameters: Results from the MARHCS cohort study
woensdag, 09 maart 2016 - Dossier: Algemeen


Bron: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949865?dopt=Abstract

Environ Int. 2016 Mar 4;91:116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.028. (Epub ahead of print)

Effects of cell phone use on semen parameters: Results from the MARHCS cohort study in Chongqing, China.

Zhang G 1, Yan H 1, Chen Q 1, Liu K 1, Ling X 1, Sun L 1, Zhou N 1, Wang Z 1, Zou P 1, Wang X 1, Tan L 1, Cui Z 1, Zhou Z 2, Liu J 1, Ao L3, Cao J 4.

1 Institute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
2 Department of Environmental Health, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
3 Institute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: aolin117@163.com.
4 Institute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: caojia1962@126.com.

Abstract
Epidemiological and experimental evidence for detrimental effects of cell phone use on semen quality is still equivocal. And that recruiting participants from infertility clinic not from general population may raise the possibility of a selection bias. To investigate effects of cell phone use on semen parameters in a general population,We screened and documented the cell phone use information of 794 young men from the Male Reproductive Health in Chongqing College students (MARHCS) cohort study in 2013, followed by 666 and 568 in 2014 and 2015, respectively. In the univariate regression analyses, we found that the daily duration of talking on the cell phone was significantly associated with decreased semen parameters, including sperm concentration β coefficient=-6.32% per unit daily duration of talking on the cell phone (h); 95% confidence interval (CI), -11.94, -0.34 and total sperm count (-8.23; 95% CI, -14.38, -1.63) in 2013; semen volume (-8.37; 95% CI, -15.93, -0.13) and total sperm count (-16.59; 95% CI, -29.91, -0.73) in 2015. Internet use via cellular networks was also associated with decreased sperm concentration and total sperm counts in 2013 and decreased semen volume in 2015. Multivariate analyses were used to adjust for the effects of potential confounders, and significant negative associations between internet use and semen parameters remained. Consistent but nonsignificant negative associations between talking on the cell phone and semen parameters persisted throughout the three study years, and the negative association was statistically significant in a mixed model that considered all three years of data on talking on the cell phone and semen quality. Our results showed that certain aspects of cell phone use may negatively affect sperm quality in men by decreasing the semen volume, sperm concentration, or sperm count, thus impairing male fertility.

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:
Cell phone; Internet use; Sperm parameters; Talking


Ga terug naar het hoofdmenu
Afdrukken | Vragen | RSS | Disclaimer