StopUMTS Logo
how to get rid of moles
Zoeken
   
Voorlichting
20/03/17Meetspecialisten, meet
16/03/17Plaatsing zendmasten en g
Artikelen
25/03/17De slimme meter als spion
24/03/17Video over de gevaren van
24/03/17Voordracht Hugo Schooneve
23/03/17COMPILATIE: Maatregelen v
23/03/17Google Glass Alert: Po
20/03/17Profitability Versus Publ
Berichten Nederland
27/03/17Bilthoven: Hoorzitting ze
26/03/17‘12.000 doden, we moete
26/03/17Maurice de Hond stapt noo
22/03/17SOLK: bericht op facebook
17/03/17Milieuklachten (zendmast,
Berichten België
18/03/17Proximus lanceert 4,5G in
09/02/17Lezing: Elektrosmog - De
Berichten Internationaal
23/03/17USA: Massachusetts Cel
23/03/17USA: Seventeen Ohio Ci
23/03/17Filipijnen: Community res
22/03/17Bangladesh: A mobile t
Ervaringen | Appellen/oproepen
19/03/17Hong Kong residents urge
06/03/17Mother Warns Women Not to
02/03/17Slimme meter verwijder
Onderzoeken
24/03/17Combined biological and h
20/03/17High radiofrequency radia
20/03/17Evaluation of Mobile P
Veel gestelde vragen
23/07/16Vakantie? Witte zo
10/07/16Zeven veel gestelde vrage
Juridische informatie
05/03/17'Staat moet verantwoordel
28/02/17USA: Judge Rules Californ
28/01/17Oostenrijk: Een burgemees
Oproepen
22/04/17Stichting EHS: Landelijke
08/04/17CURSUS: Straling meten
27/03/17Lezing over Kanker in Haa
Folders
21/02/17Brochures, folders, websi
29/04/16USA: Meer dan 50 tips voo
Briefwisselingen | Archief: 2008, 2005
05/03/17Mail naar ''kunnenweprate
05/03/17Brief aan de gemeente Epe
Illustraties
 Algemeen
 Fotoalbum zendmasten
 Wetenschappelijke illustraties
High radiofrequency radiation at Stockholm Old Town    
Ga naar overzicht berichten in: Onderzoeken

High radiofrequency radiation at Stockholm Old Town
maandag, 20 maart 2017 - Dossier: Algemeen


Bron: Molecular and Clinical Oncology 6: 462-476, 2017462

High radiofrequency radiation at Stockholm Old Town: An exposimeter study including the Royal Castle, Supreme Court, three major squares and the Swedish Parliament


LENNART HARDELL 1, MICHAEL CARLBERG 1, TARMO KOPPEL 2 and LENA HEDENDAHL 3
1 Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE‑701 82 Örebro, Sweden;
2 Department of Labour Environment and Safety, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia;
3 Independent Environment and Health Research Luleå, SE‑972 53 Luleå, Sweden Received October 17, 2016; Accepted January 30, 2017

Abstract.
Exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation was classified as a possible human carcinogen, Group 2B, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer at WHO in 2011. The exposure pattern is changing due to the rapid development of technology. Outdoor RF radiation level was measured during five tours in Stockholm Old Town in April, 2016 using the EME Spy 200 exposimeter with 20 predefined frequencies. The results were based on 10,437 samples in total. The mean level of the total RF radiation was 4,293 µW/m2 (0.4293 µW/cm2). The highest mean levels were obtained for global system for mobile communications (GSM) + universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS) 900 downlink and long‑term evolution (LTE) 2600 downlink (1,558 and 1,265 µW/m2, respectively). The town squares displayed highest total mean levels, with the example of Järntorget square with 24,277 µW/m2 (min 257, max 173,302 µW/m2). These results were in large contrast to areas with lowest total exposure, such as the Supreme Court, with a mean level of 404 µW/m2 (min 20.4, max 4,088 µW/m2). In addition, measurements in the streets surrounding the Royal Castle were lower than the total for the Old Town, with a mean of 756 µW/m2 (min 0.3, max 50,967 µW/m2). The BioInitiative 2012 Report defined the scientific benchmark for possible health risks as 30‑60 µW/m2. Our results of outdoor RF radiation exposure at Stockholm Old Town are significantly above that level. The mean exposure level at Järntorget square was 405‑fold higher than 60 µW/m2. Our results were below the reference level on 10,000,000 µW/m2 established by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), which, however, are less credible, as they do not take non‑thermal effects into consideration and are not based on sound scientific evaluation. Our highest measured mean level at Järntorget was 0.24% of the ICNIRP level. A number of studies have found adverse, non-thermal (no measurable temperature increase) health effects far below the ICNIRP guidelines.


Ga terug naar het hoofdmenu
Afdrukken | Vragen | RSS | Disclaimer