StopUMTS Logo
how to get rid of moles 
Zoeken
   
Voorlichting
19/04/18Metaalkeuze ter behoeve v
08/03/18Boeken over EMV / stralin
Artikelen
21/04/18Report on National Toxico
20/04/18COMPILATIE: Maatregelen v
20/04/18Vaccins: International sc
19/04/18Scientific Research On 5G
16/04/18Deadly common combo produ
13/04/18Can Cell Phones Cause Fem
Berichten Nederland
21/04/18It’ers breken via web i
21/04/18Grote groei mobiele netwe
20/04/18Gezondheidsraad: Hoogspan
19/04/18Lezing: Smartphones, WiFi
19/04/18Informatieavond over zend
Berichten België
03/04/18Teken de petitie tegen ve
29/03/18Huidkanker: “België he
Berichten Internationaal
19/04/18Huawei boss warns the pot
17/04/18Bulging Debt May Spell Tr
15/04/18Huidkanker: Incidentie in
13/04/18French Telecom Operator O
Ervaringen | Appellen/oproepen
20/04/18Skin Cancer, Cell phones
14/04/18Video over straling thuis
11/04/185G en LED verlichting; sl
Onderzoeken
13/04/18Electromagnetic radiation
11/04/18Semi-quantitative proteom
26/03/18Aggressive Brain Tumors o
Veel gestelde vragen
13/05/17Vakantie? Witte zo
10/07/16Zeven veel gestelde vrage
Juridische informatie
02/03/18Formal Complaint to the E
26/02/185G From Space & Santa Fe
23/01/18Reeks publicaties op juri
Oproepen
19/04/18Lezing: Smartphones, WiFi
07/04/18EHS Uitnodiging landelijk
29/03/18Bijeenkomst Klankbordgroe
Folders
10/09/17Brochures, folders, websi
29/04/16USA: Meer dan 50 tips voo
Briefwisselingen | Archief: 2008, 2005
05/04/18Brief naar Monique Beerla
04/04/18Volkskrant: e-mail naar d
Illustraties
 Algemeen
 Fotoalbum zendmasten
 Wetenschappelijke illustraties
USA: Rechtszaak tegen hotspots die mogelijk in Nederland navolging verdient    
Ga naar overzicht berichten in: Juridische Informatie

USA: Rechtszaak tegen hotspots die mogelijk in Nederland navolging verdient
woensdag, 10 december 2014 - Dossier: Juridische informatie


Bron: www.sfgate.com/business/article/Comcast-sued-for-turning-home-Wi-Fi-routers-into-5943750.php .
9 dec. 2014

Comcast sued for turning home Wi-Fi routers into public hotspots


Two East Bay residents are suing Comcast for plugging their home’s wireless router into what they call a power-wasting, Internet-clogging, privacy threatening network of public Wi-Fi hotspots.

The class-action suit, filed last week in U.S. District Court in San Francisco on behalf of Toyer Grear and daughter Joycelyn Harris, claims Comcast is “exploiting them for profit” by using their Pittsburg home’s router as part of a nationwide network of public hotspots.

Comcast is trying to compete with major cell phone carriers by creating a public Xfinity WiFi Hotspot network in 19 of the country’s largest cities. The company is activating a second high-speed Internet channel broadcast from newer-model wireless gateway modems that residential customers lease from the company. It plans to spread to 8 million hotspots by the end of the year.

The secondary signal is supposed to be separate from the private Wi-Fi channel customers use, and it is intended for houseguests or Comcast subscribers who happen to be in range and using mobile devices.

The Philadelphia company, which owns the nation’s largest cable TV service and entertainment giant NBCUniversal, began activating the secondary channel in the Bay Area this summer. Customers who own cable modems aren’t affected.

Although Comcast has said its subscribers have the right to disable the secondary signal, the suit claims the company turns the service on without permission and places “the costs of its national Wi-Fi network onto its customers.”

“Comcast’s contract with its customers is so vague that it is unclear as to whether Comcast even addresses this practice at all, much less adequately enough to be said to have obtained its customers’ authorization of this practice,” the suit claims.

The suit quotes a test conducted by Philadelphia networking technology company Speedify that concluded the secondary Internet channel will eventually push “tens of millions of dollars per month of the electricity bills needed to run their nationwide public Wi-Fi network onto consumers.”

Tests showed that under heavy use, the secondary channel adds 30 to 40 percent more costs to a customer’s electricity bill than the modem itself, the suit said.

The suit also said “the data and information on a Comcast customer’s network is at greater risk” because the hotspot network “allows strangers to connect to the Internet through the same wireless router used by Comcast customers.”

Comcast did not have any immediate comment on the suit. But the company has previously said the modems have two antennas — separating the signals and offer a layer of privacy protection. Comcast has also said the energy costs will depend on how much guests use a resident’s Wi-Fi.

Although Comcast has said it has enough bandwidth to handle the extra traffic, the suit claims Grear and Harris have suffered from “decreased, inadequate speeds on their home Wi-Fi network.”

The suit asks for unspecified damages and an injunction preventing Comcast from using home wireless routers for its hotspot network.


Ga terug naar het hoofdmenu
Afdrukken | Vragen | RSS | Disclaimer